Information and Communications Technology’s Impact on Work–life Interference: Cases of ‘Employee-friendly Organizations’
In our paper we examine the theoretical and practical impacts of information technology on work and work–life interference. Our paper is based on the results of the ‘Employee Friendly Workplace’ research project conducted in Hungary between 2007 and 2012, in which we explored the practices of ten family-friendly or best workplace prize-winning companies using qualitative research methods (individual interviews and focus groups). The main foci of our study are to explore the different perceptions, expectations and interpretations regarding employees’ work–life balance, how these are related to companies’ employee friendliness, how the employee-friendly practices are transformed by ICT (information and communication technology) .
Based on our research, the role of ICT is controversial: 24-hour online availability and the opportunity to work over the Internet with computers and mobile phones from anywhere can evidently support a healthy WLB and provide the possibility of a more flexible work schedule. At the same time, though, these can disturb the balance and invade private lives, creating a kind of ‘modern slavery’. In some cases employees become addicted, and the border between their work and their private life becomes blurred: they are willing to sacrifice their family time or hobby to work day and night, and in some cases this can become an expectation towards employees as well. We reach the final conclusion that technology solves several problems connected with work–family balance and obviously helps employees to find self-fulfilment in their work and family at the same time, while it creates new problems: overwork, obsession with work (and technology itself), mental and physical exhaustion and burnout. At the same time, work social support, independently from ICT, provides the greatest help for employees in need.
Aryee, S. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among married professional women: Evidence from Singapore. Human Relations, 45, 813-837.
Beigi, M., Ershadi, S. M., & Shirmohammadi, M. (2012). Work-family conflict and its antecedents among Iranian operating room personnel. Management
Research Review, 35(10), 958-973.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169-198.
Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Work-family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference? Journal of Management, 26(5), 1031-
Carlson, D. S., & Perrewé, P. L. (1999). The role of social support in the stressor-strain relationship: An examination of work-family conflict. Journal of Management, 25 (4), 513-540.
Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., & Zivnuska, S. (2009). Is work-family balance more than conflict and enrichment? Human Relations, 62, 1459-1486.
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249-276.
Cifre, E., & Salanova, M. (2008). Work/non-work interface: A challenge to human resources management. In Ch. Wankel (Ed.), 21st-Century Management. Sage: New York.
Clark, S. C. (2001). Work cultures and work/family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 348-365.
Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work-family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425-442.
Dén-Nagy, I. (2014): A double-edged sword?: a critical evaluation of the mobile phone in creating work-life balance, New Technology, Work and Employment, 29:2, 193-211.
Dén-Nagy, I. (2013): Az Infokommunikációs technológiák munka-magánélet egyensúly megteremtésében játszott szerepe – elméleti áttekintés, szocio.hu, 13/3.
Dubin, R. (1956). Industrial workers' world: A study in the central life interests of industrial workers. Social Problems, 4, 3-13.
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of
Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
Fábián, G. (2007). Kísérlet a nyelvtanárszerep fogalmának integrált megközelítésére. Veszprém: Pannon Egyetem Veszprém Interdiszciplináris Doktori Iskola
Neveléstudományi Doktori Program.
Frone, M. R., & Rice, R. W. (1987). Work-family conflict: The effect of job and family involvement. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8(1), 45-53.
Frone, M. R., Barnes, G. M., & Farrell, M. P. (1994). Relationship of work-family conflict to substance use among employed mothers: The role of negative affect.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(4), 1019-1030.
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Prevalence of work- family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 13, 723-729.
Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work-family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
Fu, C. K., & Shaffer, M. A. (2001). The tug of work and family – Direct and indirect domain-specific determinants of work-family conflict. Personnel Review,
Geszler, N. (2015): Work-Family Conflict of Hungarian Manager Fathers, draft version of the final thesis, unpublished manuscript, Corvinus University of
Geurts, S. A., & Demerouti, E. (2003). Work/non-work interface: A review of theories and findings. In M. J. Schabracq, J. A. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.),
The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex.
Gold, M., Mustafa, M. (2013): 'Work always wins': client colonization, time management and the anxietys of connected freelancers, New Technology, Work and
Employment, 28:3, 197-211.
Golden, A., G., Geisler, C. (2007): Work-life boundary management and the personal digital assistant, Human Relations, 60: 519-551.
Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-family balance: Exploration of a concept. Families and Work Conference, Provo, UT.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510-531.
Grzywacz, J. G., & Carlson, D. S. (2007). Conceptualizing work-family balance: Implications for practice and research. Advances in Developing Human
Resources, 9(4), 455-471.
Grzywacz, J., & Marks, N. F. (1999). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover
between work and family. CDE Working Paper No. 99-03, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology, Irvine, CA.
Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560-568.
Haar, J. M., & Bardoel, A. (2008). Work-family positive spillover and employee outcomes Australia: The moderating effects of life satisfaction. The Australian
Centre for Research in Employment and Work. Victoria: Monash University.
Hanson, G. C., Hammer, L. B., & Colton, C. L. (2006). Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 249-265.
Hislop, D., Bosch_Sijtsema, P., Zimmermann, A. (2013): Introduction for special themed section: information and communication technologies and the work-life
boundary, New Technology, Work and Employment, 28:3, 177-178.
House, J. S. (1981): Work stress and social support, Publisher: Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Kahn, R., Wolfe, D., Quinn, R., Snoek, J., & Rosenthal,
R. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Wiley: New York.
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Work Alienation: An Integrative Approach. Praeger: New York.
Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2006): Time Use and the Impact of Technology, Time and Society, 15(1): 57-80.
Király, G., Nagy, B., Gérig, Zs., Radó, M. Lovas, Y., Pálóczi B. (2015): Spillover: empirical utilization of the concept. An overview of the social scientific corpus
from 2004 to 2014, OTKA Report.
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., Sheep, M. L. (2009): Balancing Borders and Bridges: Negotiation the Wok-Home Interface via Boundary Wok Tactics, Academy
of Management Journal, 52 (4): 704-730.
Maertz, C. P. Jr., Boyar, S. L. (2011): Work-Family Conflict, Enrichment and Balance under "Levels" and "Episodes" Approaches, Journal of Management, 37:68-
Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 921-936.
Michel, J. S., Mitchelson, J. K., Kotrba, L. M., LeBreton, J. M., & Baltes, B. B. (2009). A comparative test of work-family conflict models and critical examination of
work-family linkages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 199-218.
Middleton, C. A. (2008): Do Mobile Technologies Enable Work-Life Balance? Dual Perspectives on BlackBerry Usage for Supplemental Work, in: Mobility and
Technology in the Workplace, ed.: Hislop, D., Rutledge, London.
Richardson, K, Benbunan-Fich, R. (2011): Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non-work time, Information and Organization, 21:
Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 80, 6-15.
Sayah, S. (2013): Managing work-life boundaries with information and communication technologies: the case of independent contractors, New Technology, Work
and Employment, 28:3, 179-196.
Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 567-578.
Voydanoff, P. (2007). Work, Family, and Community - Exploring Interconnections. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: New Jersey
Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., Brown, J. E. (2008): Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions, Sociology, 42(4): 635-652.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work three months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. This acknowledgement is not automatic, it should be asked from the editors and can usually be obtained one year after its first publication in the journal.