The Changing Dynamics of the Effective Protection of EU External Borders or/and Forced Migrants

Authors

  • Michal Vít Metropolitan University Prague
  • Judit Tóth

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v4i4.502
Abstract Views: 759 PDF Downloads: 470

Abstract

The experience of a migration crisis (2015 and 2016) on the edge of Schengen and EU territory has demonstrated two divergent development perspectives. From both the EU and its Member States, there has been increasing demand to protect the EU’s external borders. This requires trust in both national and EU (Frontex) authorities that are supposed to be the guardians of national and European security. At the same time, however, negative sentiments towards migrants have increased and continue to arise from different cultural backgrounds within Member States. These diverging perspectives are struggling to develop hand in hand with the current and requested role of the Frontex agency. There are rising tensions concerning the legality of measures introduced on external borders in order to protect the EU territory effectively. There is enormous disparity between the requested norms and standards and EU and international law, which mirrors the strong anti-migrant sentiment within CEE Member States. This paper analyses the disparity between EU and international norms with the measures being introduced on the EU’s external border with the Western Balkan states. It also aims to analyze the medium-term impact of this disparity at a national and EU level from the perspective of efficiency, solidarity and legality. The migrant influx may be addressed as an example of crisis management in the context of how these three principles of EU law are implemented within CEE Member States as a part of the (political, geographical and cultural) map of Europe.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-21

How to Cite

[1]
Vít, M. and Tóth, J. 2019. The Changing Dynamics of the Effective Protection of EU External Borders or/and Forced Migrants. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics. 4, 4 (Jan. 2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v4i4.502.